MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383616297 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggad272

3-D forward modelling of controlled-source frequency-domain electromagnetic data using the meshless generalized finite-difference method

2023· article· en· W4383616297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiscretizationSolverInterpolation (computer graphics)Applied mathematicsFinite element methodFinite difference methodFinite differenceMathematicsBasis functionAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY This paper proposes a procedure of forward modelling 3-D frequency-domain wire-source electromagnetic data using the meshless generalized finite-difference (MGFD) method. This method is based on Taylor series expansions and the weighted least-squares method, and its basic principle is to express the partial derivatives of the unknown function on a particular central point by a linear combination of function values on the adjacent points. The advantages of the method over mainstream forward-modelling methods, for example, the regular finite-difference (FD) method, or the finite-element (FE) method, is that mesh generation is not needed: a discretization in the form of just points is applied instead. This allows the points to be distributed freely to fit the arbitrary shape of the structures in the model, which is helpful in the modelling of complex earth structures. It makes the MGFD method more suitable to deal with complex model than FD method. Also, unlike that in the FE method, interpolation functions are not required and no integral needs to be calculated in MGFD method. This results in high computational efficiency and a concise forward-modelling process. In this paper, the particulars of the MGFD method are introduced, the discretized MGFD system of equations (for an ${\boldsymbol{A}} - {\rm{\ }}\varphi $ potential decomposition of the fields, with the Coulomb gauge condition enforced and a primary–secondary separation approach to deal with the singularity of the source) are solved using a direct solver, and the forward-modelling code are programmed. To test the method and code, we compare the MGFD solutions for three 3-D earth models with the equivalent solutions calculated by other methods, and verify the correctness of the MGFD solution by the good agreement between the corresponding results (with relative error of the electric field ${{\boldsymbol{E}}}_{\boldsymbol{x}}$ smaller than 4.89 per cent). We also investigate the performance of this method when applying different discretizations of points, and when using different weighting functions, to assess the influence of these two factors on the forward-modelling accuracy and efficiency. Results indicate that denser point distributions and straightforward weighting functions result in better accuracy and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it