MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383682053 · doi:10.35490/ec3.2023.213

Machine learning-based fault detection and preliminary diagnosis for terminal air-handling units

2023· article· en· W4383682053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in construction · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsFuseforward (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisFault detection and isolationComputer scienceUnsupervised learningTerminal (telecommunication)Fault (geology)Artificial intelligenceNoise (video)Cluster (spacecraft)Data miningMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered classification techniques, data-driven Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) methods have become increasingly prominent in smart building implementation. Of these, cluster analysis is particularly promising for Building management system (BMS) data. This paper presents an unsupervised learning-based strategy for detecting faults in terminal air handling units as well as the systems serving them. Historical sensor data is pre-processed with PCA to reduce dimensions, followed by OPTICS clustering, which is compared with k-means. OPTICS outperformed the latter, readily identifying noise and had high accuracy across all seasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it