Incremental Learning-Based Algorithm for Anomaly Detection Using Computed Tomography Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a nuclear power plant (NPP), the used tools are visually inspected to ensure their integrity before and after their use in the nuclear reactor. The manual inspection is usually performed by qualified technicians and takes a large amount of time (weeks up to months). In this work, we propose an automated tool inspection that uses a classification model for anomaly detection. The deep learning model classifies the computed tomography (CT) images as defective (with missing components) or defect-free. Moreover, the proposed algorithm enables incremental learning (IL) using a proposed thresholding technique to ensure a high prediction confidence by continuous online training of the deployed online anomaly detection model. The proposed algorithm is tested with existing state-of-the-art IL methods showing that it helps the model quickly learn the anomaly patterns. In addition, it enhances the classification model confidence while preserving a desired minimal performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it