MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384153738 · doi:10.1007/s12598-023-02288-y

Reducing structural degradation of high‐voltage single‐crystal Ni‐rich cathode through in situ doping strategy

2023· article· en· W4384153738 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRare Metals · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hainan ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceCathodeDegradation (telecommunications)ElectrochemistryLithium (medication)DopingCapacity lossChemical engineeringCrystalliteDiffusionNanotechnologyElectrodeOptoelectronicsMetallurgyElectronic engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polycrystalline Ni‐rich layered oxide (LiNi x Co y Mn z O 2 (NCM), x > 0.8) cathode material with high specific capacity and low cost is considered as one of the most promising candidate materials for lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs). However, it suffers from severe structural and capacity degradation during practical cycling, especially under harsh operation condition (ultrahigh cutoff voltage and elevated temperature, etc.). One promising approach to mitigate these issues is to develop a single‐crystal Ni‐rich NCM cathode, which could enhance structural integrity and improve capacity retention, due to its robust and stable micro‐sized primary particles. However, the improved cyclic stability comes at the expense of reversible capacity and rate capability, owing to the relatively low Li + diffusion efficiency for its micron‐sized primary particles. Moreover, the structural degradation and exacerbation of interfacial reactions for the Ni‐rich NCM cathode under high‐voltage (≥ 4.5 V) would quickly trigger the poor electrochemical performance, limiting its practical applications. Herein, LiNi 0.827 Co 0.11 Zr 0.003 Mn 0.06 O 2 (Zr@SC‐N 83 ) cathode material was successfully synthesized via the in situ doping strategy. It could not only effectively maintain the reversibility of phase transition between H2 and H3 after long‐term cycling at high voltage (4.6 V), but also enhance lithium‐ion diffusion, thus improving the cycling performance and good rate performance for the Zr@SC‐N 83 cathode. As a result, 0.3 wt% Zr‐doping cathode delivers an initial discharging capacity of 200.1 mAh·g −1 at 1.0C and at the high cutoff voltage of 4.6 V, exhibiting the satisfactory capacity retention of 85.5% after 100 cycles. It provides an effective route toward low‐cost and higher energy density for lithium‐ion batteries with Ni‐rich cathode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it