MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384558363 · doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ace7c4

Optimization of Doping Concentration to Obtain High Internal Quantum Efficiency and Wavelength Stability in An InGaN/GaN Blue Light-Emitting Diode

2023· article· en· W4384558363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaMcMaster University
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsLight-emitting diodeDopingWavelengthDiodeQuantum efficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conduct a comprehensive study to investigate the feasibility of achieving high internal quantum efficiency (IQE) and wavelength stability in an InGaN/GaN blue light-emitting diode (LED) through numerical simulations with different doping concentrations. To ensure accurate calculations, we emulated the structure of an LED, fabricated on freestanding GaN with low defect density, abrupt interfaces, and high-performing characteristics, which resemble ideal conditions. Our objective is to determine the optimal doping concentration of the claddings using the Quantum Drift-Diffusion (QDD) model. We tested three concentrations ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">low</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> </mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">middle</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> </mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ig</mml:mi> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), and found that <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">middle</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> produced the highest IQE of 82.5%, the most stable wavelength <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>ˆ</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mfenced close=")" open="("> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>457.0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:mspace width="1em"/> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi> </mml:math> in the range of (0.08–63.25) mA, an optical power of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>14.76</mml:mn> </mml:math> mWs −1 , and a forward voltage of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">middle</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.81</mml:mn> </mml:math> V at 20 mA. We suggest that using this concentration leads to the parameters closest to those of the reference device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it