MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384662027 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3155064/v1

Developing Global Open Access COVID-19 Education for Frontline Healthcare Workers

2023· preprint· en· W4384662027 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline Christianson, Erica Frank, Stacen A. Keating, Miriam Chickering

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Research and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careMassive open online courseMedical educationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health equityDistance educationKnowledge translationPopulationMedicinePublic relationsBusinessNursingPolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceKnowledge managementPedagogyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Early in the Covid-19 pandemic, we identified a heightened need for a reliable, high-quality, accessible, and evidence-based educational resource for frontline healthcare workers. Open access virtual education can reduce disparities in access to education by minimizing cost barriers and providing equitable access to educational content. Our team of global healthcare educators responded by creating an open access competency-based online course to address access disparities around Covid-19 information. The course was aimed toward frontline healthcare workers globally and included design elements such as a built-in language translation tool and non-linear course design to facilitate access and address the individual’s educational needs. Methods: Pre- and post-course surveys were collected to evaluate how the course addressed learner needs. Data were collected between the course launch in April 2020 through December 2020. Results: An initial population of students (N=149) ranging from high school through doctoral education, living in 23 different countries, speaking 22 different native languages took the course and participated in the pre- and/or post-course surveys. Overall, participants rated the course highly. Conclusion: Open access educational models can facilitate equitable access to education for a global audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaOpen science
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.512
GPT teacher head0.650
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Open science

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicDental Research and COVID-19CategoryOpen scienceFrench-language works237,207