MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384788000 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2023.3290007

AoI-Minimal Online Scheduling for Wireless-Powered IoT: A Lyapunov Optimization-Based Approach

2023· article· en· W4384788000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLyapunov optimizationScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceWirelessMathematical optimizationLyapunov functionDiscrete time and continuous timeWireless power transferFadingChannel (broadcasting)Computer networkMathematicsLyapunov exponentLyapunov equationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the age of information (AoI)-based online scheduling in multi-sensor wireless powered communication networks (WPCNs) for time-sensitive Internet of Things (IoT). Specifically, we consider a typical WPCN model, where a wireless power station (WPS) charges multiple sensor nodes (SNs) by wireless power transfer (WPT), and then the SNs are scheduled in the time domain to transmit their sampled status information with their harvested energy to a mobile edge server (MES) for decision making. For such a system, we first derive a closed-form expression of the successful data transmission probability in Nakagami- <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> fading channels. To pursue an efficient online scheduling policy that minimizes the Expected Weighted Sum AoI (EWSAoI) of the system, a discrete-time scheduling problem is formulated. As the problem is non-convex with non-explicit expression of the EWSAoI, we propose a Max-Weight policy based on the Lyapunov optimization theory, which schedules the SNs at the beginning of each time in terms of the one-slot conditional Lyapunov Drift. Simulations demonstrate our presented theoretical results and show that our proposed scheduling policy outperforms other baselines such as the greedy policy and random round-robin (RR) policy. Especially, when the number of SNs is relatively small, the gain achieved by the proposed policy compared to the greedy policy is considerable. Moreover, some interesting insights are also observed: 1) as the number of SNs increases, the EWSAoI also increases; 2) when the transmit power is relatively small, the larger the number of SNs, the smaller the EWSAoI; 3) the EWSAoI decreases with the increment of transmit power of the WPS and then tends to be flat; 4) the EWSAoI increases with the increment of the distance between the SNs and the MES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it