MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384828140 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3135514/v1

Predictive Biomarker Profiles in Cancer Using a Unique AI Model Based on Set Theory

2023· preprint· en· W4384828140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)BiomarkerOutcome (game theory)CancerSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiomarker discoveryMachine learningComputational biologyMedicineInternal medicineMathematicsBiologyProteomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The current study applies a new artificial intelligence (AI) method, ALiX, which is based on interval arithmetic, to analyze and interpret biological data for a clinical problem: identification of biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Key unique and important features of this study is that ALiX provides an explanation to our medical hypothesis in the form of a list of ranked protein biomarkers that identifies which biomarkers are the most significant drivers of the predicted outcome, a capability that is not currently available in other AI applications. This study identifies a unique profile for stratifying cancer patients and for further stratifying the patients with cancer into subtypes that respond to treatment or not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it