MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384910496 · doi:10.1504/ijwmc.2023.132429

Analysis of discrete voltage level energy efficient scheduling for fixed priority framework

2023· article· en· W4384910496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)VoltageReal-time computingDistributed computingMathematical optimizationElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption has become an increasingly important consideration in the design of real-time embedded systems. In this study, we have also tried scheduling real-time tasks under energy savings, which shows a possibility of energy reduction compared to systems employing no power saving. In this work, efforts are made to study the scheduling of soft real-time jobs with hard real-time jobs. In this study, apart from investigating the effect of voltage variation on power consumption, we have also studied its effect on the response time of soft jobs. Resource reclaiming is further explored in the proposed approach as some tasks are completed before their worst-case execution time. The analysis of resource reclaiming shows that it improves average response time and also saves energy when compared to approaches where reclaiming is not employed. Designing real-time systems with multiple processors that use less energy is still an open area of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it