Preprocessing Large Datasets Using Gaussian Mixture Modelling to Improve Prediction Accuracy of Truck Productivity at Mine Sites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreProcessing Large Datasets Using gaUssian MixtUre MoDeLLing to iMProve PreDiction accUracy of trUck ProDUctivity at Mine sitesThe historical datasets at operating mine sites are usually large.Directly applying large datasets to build prediction models may lead to inaccurate results.To overcome the real-world challenges, this study aimed to handle these large datasets using gaussian mixture modelling (gMM) for developing a novel and accurate prediction model of truck productivity.A large dataset of truck haulage collected at operating mine sites was clustered by gMM into three latent classes before the prediction model was built.The labels of these latent classes generated a latent variable.Two multiple linear regression (MLr) models were then constructed, including the ordinary-MLr (o-MLr) and the hybrid gMM-MLr models.The gMM-MLr model incorporated the observed input variables and a latent variable in the form of interaction terms.The o-MLr model was the baseline model and did not involve the latent variable.The gMM-MLr model performed considerably better than the o-MLr model in predicting truck productivity.The interaction terms quantitatively measured the differences in how the observed input variables affected truck productivity in three classes (high, medium, and low truck productivity).The haul distance was the most crucial input variable in the gMM-MLr model.This study provides new insights into handling massive amounts of data in truck haulage datasets and a more accurate prediction model for truck productivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it