Transmission Order Optimization of Coded Distributed Computing in Heterogeneous Wireless Multiple-Access Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coded distributed computing (CDC) has been recently proposed as a promising technique to mitigate the straggler effect in the distributed computing cluster which consists of workers with different computing capabilities, and to reduce the end-to-end task execution latency. However, the heterogeneity of computing and transmission will critically impact the latency performance, especially in the wireless multiple-access network. In this paper, we use CDC over the heterogeneous wireless multipleaccess network (HWMAN) including both computation stragglers and transmission stragglers with various capabilities. In order to reduce the computing task completion latency (computing latency and transmission latency), the optimal stop computing time of workers and the sorting order of result transmission back are obtained via two designed algorithms, namely straggler detection and ordered transmission (SDOT) and worker sorting and ordered transmission (WSOT), respectively, which not only fully utilize the computing results of stragglers, but also improve the total latency performance compared with other existing state-of-theart algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it