MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385078254 · doi:10.18280/isi.280303

Os-ETL: A High-Efficiency, Open-Scala Solution for Integrating Heterogeneous Data in Large-Scale Data Warehousing

2023· article· en· W4385078254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
El Yazid Gueddoudj, Azeddine Chikh, Abdelouahab Attıa

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Tlemcen
KeywordsData warehouseScalaComputer scienceDatabaseScale (ratio)Operating systemJavaGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surge in data volume necessitates the integration of Resource Description Framework (RDF) data within corporate environments.While Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes exhibit proficiency with conventional data sources, their scalability diminishes when applied to large and highly varied data sources, inclusive of RDF data.The latter constitutes a wealth of knowledge that, when harnessed via data warehouse technology, can augment corporate value in a fiercely competitive milieu.The advent of platforms like polystore offers opportunities for advanced hardware deployment.ETL processes necessitate two crucial phases: Partitioning and data allocation.Concurrently, the scientific community is spurred to innovate ETL processes that support real-time analytics.This study proposes a novel architecture for ETL processes, named Open-Scala-ETL (Os-ETL).Equipped with a method for deploying a data warehouse based on a polystore, Os-ETL enables real-time analysis.The primary objective of the Os-ETL solution is to resolve the complexities in deploying a graph structure data warehouse on a polystore-a process that involves partitioning and data allocation.Os-ETL is a distributed solution that supports both batch and streaming processing using the Spark framework.Scala scripts are executed within this framework to partition RDF graphs and distribute the resultant fragments across various sites.The implementation of Os-ETL is based on Apache Spark, with ETL deployment on a Spark SQL polystore.This solution empowers companies with data warehouse technology to improve performance, scalability, and latency between a data warehouse and its data sources.The approach has been assessed and validated using largescale, heterogeneous data, encompassing the LUBM benchmark, CSV files, an Oracle database, and a Neo4j graph database.The results corroborate its superior performance in terms of scalability and optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0070.009
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207