A hybrid ontology‐based semantic and machine learning model for the prediction of spring breakup
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
River ice breakups carry the potential for high flows and flooding and are of great interest to accurately predict. A challenge in forecasting these events is the management of the massive amounts of data associated with an ice season. This study couples ontological and machine learning models in a new hybrid modeling framework to predict spring breakup on a national scale. The Ice Season Ontology sorts the data and allows for a user-friendly means of analyzing any ice season, providing insight on which variables are most and least central. With this, a refined variable selection is able to be made for machine learning models. The most successful developed model, a random forest, produced highly accurate forecasts when applied to a national scale case study, with a mean absolute error of 10.85 days and an R2 of .884. This new modeling framework provides a means for decision-making support for river bound communities and a new methodology for modeling applications in other fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it