DynaQ: online learning from imbalanced multi-class streams through dynamic sampling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Online supervised learning from fast-evolving data streams, particularly in domains such as health, the environment, and manufacturing, is a crucial research area. However, these domains often experience class imbalance, which can skew class distributions. It is essential for online learning algorithms to analyze large datasets in real-time while accurately modeling rare or infrequent classes that may appear in bursts. While methods have been proposed to handle binary class imbalance, there is a lack of attention to multi-class imbalanced settings with varying degrees of imbalance in evolving streams. In this paper, we present the Dynamic Queues (DynaQ) algorithm for online learning in multi-class imbalanced settings to fill this knowledge gap. Our approach utilizes a batch-based resampling method that creates an instance queue for each class to balance the number of instances. We maintain a queue threshold and remove older samples during training. Additionally, we dynamically oversample minority classes based on one of four rate parameters: recall, F1-score, $$\kappa _m$$ κ m , and Euclidean distance. Our learning algorithm consists of an ensemble that uses sliding windows and a soft voting schema while incorporating a drift detection mechanism. Our experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the DynaQ approach over state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".