A micro-flow, high-pH, reversed-phase peptide fractionation and collection system for targeted and in-depth proteomics of low-abundance proteins in limiting samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a method and a simple system for high-pH RP-LC peptide fractionation of small sample amounts (30-60 µg), at micro-flow rates with micro-liter fraction collection using ammonium bicarbonate as an optimized buffer for system stability and robustness. The method is applicable to targeted mass spectrometry approaches and to in-depth proteomic studies where the amount of sample is limited. Using targeted proteomics with peptide standards, we present the method's analytical parameters, and potential in increasing the detection of low-abundance proteins that are difficult to quantify with direct targeted or global LC-MS analyses. This fractionation system increased peptide signals by up to 18-fold, while maintaining high quantitative precision, with high fractionation reproducibility across varied sample sets. In real applications, it increased the detection of targeted endogenous peptides by two-fold in a 25 cell-cycle-control protein panel, and in-depth MS analyses of nuclear extracts, it allowed the detection of up to 8,896 proteins with 138,417 peptides in 24-concatenated fractions compared to 3,344 proteins with 23,093 peptides without fractionation. In a relevant biological problem of CDK4/6-inhibitors and breast cancer, the method reproduced known information and revealed novel insights, highlighting that it can be successfully applied in studies involving low-abundance proteins and limited samples. •Tested nine high-pH buffer/solvent systems to obtain a robust, effective, and reproducible micro-flow fractionation method which was devoid of commonly encountered LC clogging/pressure issues after months of use.•Peptide enrichment method to improve detection and quantitation of low-abundance proteins in targeted and in-depth proteomic studies.•Can be applied to diverse protein samples where the available amount is limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".