MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385482699 · doi:10.32920/23823903.v1

An arc search interior-point algorithm for monotone linear complementarity problems over symmetric cones

2023· preprint· en· W4385482699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterior point methodMonotone polygonMathematicsArc (geometry)Complementarity (molecular biology)Linear complementarity problemAlgorithmCombinatoricsEllipsePath (computing)Convergence (economics)GeometryComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>An arc search interior-point algorithm for monotone symmetric cone linear complementarity problem is presented. The algorithm estimates the central path by an ellipse and follows an ellipsoidal approximation of the central path to reach an <em>ε</em>-approximate solution of the problem in a wide neighborhood of the central path. The convergence analysis of the algorithm is derived. Furthermore, we prove that the algorithm has the complexity bound <em>O (√rL)</em> using Nesterov-Todd search direction and <em>O (√rL)</em> by the <em>xs</em> and <em>sx</em> search directions. The obtained iteration complexities coincide with the best-known ones obtained by any proposed interior-point algorithm for this class of mathematical problems.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it