MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385519468 · doi:10.1101/2023.08.01.551352

REPRODUCTIVE COMPATIBILITY OF TWO LINES OF <i>DELIA PLATURA</i> (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE)

2023· preprint· en· W4385519468 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsCollège MontmorencyUniversité de SherbrookePhytodataBishop's University
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaBishop's University
KeywordsAnthomyiidaeBiologyHatchingReproductive isolationPEST analysisZoologyMatingBotanyEcologyDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate identification of agricultural pests is a major component of integrated pest management. The seedcorn maggot, Delia platura (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), is a cosmopolitan polyphagous pest species which may be found in high numbers in numerous crops. Two morphologically identical genetic lines of D. platura (H- and N- lines) with distinct distributions were recently identified. However, no study to date has investigated the reproductive compatibility of the two lines and thus the possibility that they may actually be two unique biological entities. A previous study described the reproductive traits of the two lines and suggested that H-line females are highly selective towards the male with which they mate, pointing to a possible pre-mating isolation mechanism between the lines. Using laboratory-reared colonies originating from the Montérégie region in Québec, this study investigates the reproductive compatibility of the two D. platura lines. We found that only one of thirty H-line females was inseminated by an N-line male, further suggesting mate choice as a pre-mating isolation mechanism between the lines. However, N-line females were readily inseminated by H-line males, suggesting a lack of pre-mating isolation in this type of cross. The eggs laid by N-line females mated with H-line males had a lower hatching rate than the ones laid by females of intra-line crosses suggesting either post-mating pre-zygotic or post-zygotic partial isolation. However, the larvae that did hatch had a comparable developmental success to those from intra-line crosses in terms of survival and developmental time from larval hatching to adult emergence, pupal weight, and adult sex ratio, suggesting a lack of post-zygotic isolation for these life stages. Considering the different biological traits of the two lines, we suggest the use of the ‘biotype’ terminology to designate the two biological entities and discuss their implications for integrated pest management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it