MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385521945 · doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3297176

Learning-Based Risk-Bounded Path Planning Under Environmental Uncertainty

2023· article· en· W4385521945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationProbabilistic logicBounded functionArtificial neural networkPath (computing)GaussianMotion planningArtificial intelligenceRobotMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building a general and efficient path planning framework in uncertain nonconvex environments is challenging due to the safety constraints and complex configuration. Traditional avenues usually involve convexifying obstacles and presume Gaussian distribution, which are not universal. Meanwhile, the fast convergence of high-quality solutions is not guaranteed. Therefore, we develop a novel neural risk-bounded path planner to quickly find near-optimal solutions that have an acceptable collision probability in the complex environments. Firstly, we retrieve the nonconvex obstacles with arbitrary probabilistic uncertainties in the form of a deterministic point cloud map. A neural network sampler encodes it into a latent embedding and is trained with sufficient expert demonstrations, predicting states in the potential subspace. We construct a neural cost estimator to select the best informed state from those samples. Then, we recursively use the simple yet effective neural networks to march toward the start and goal bidirectionally. The collision risk of the intermediate connections is verified based on sum-of-squares optimization. Simulation results show that our approach significantly saves time and resources in finding comparable solutions over the state-of-the-art methods in the seen and unseen challenging environments. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Note to Practitioners</i> —More and more robots are deployed in unstructured environments, such as forests and subterranean caves. However, uncertainty in the environment situational awareness usually causes accidents. To quickly generate safe paths without over-conservation in uncertain complex environments, we propose a neural risk-bounded sampling-based path planner. Conventional methods consume lots of computation time and resources to generate satisfactory results. Our learning-based risk-bounded path planning framework can efficiently find paths with a guaranteed risk tolerance avoiding uncertain nonconvex static obstacles. It imitates the expert to generate informed states in a subspace that potentially contains the optimal solution. In practice, we need to formulate the observed uncertain obstacle at a grid map into the polynomial containing random variables and determine their probability distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it