MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Semi-Autonomous Control of Drones/UAVs for Wilderness Search and Rescue

2023· article· en· W4385656136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersCanadian Defence Academy
KeywordsDroneLaptopSearch and rescueSoftware deploymentComputer scienceQuadcopterGlobal Positioning SystemReal-time computingController (irrigation)AeronauticsTrajectoryArtificial intelligenceRobotComputer visionEngineeringAerospace engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wilderness search and rescue (WiSAR) has been one of the most significant robotic applications in the past decade. In order to succeed in these life-saving operations, the deployment of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has become an inevitable trend. This paper presents the development of a low-cost solution for semi-autonomous control of drones/UAVs in WiSAR applications. ArduPilot based flight controller was implemented to enable autonomous trajectory following of the drones/UAVs. A high resolution action camera attached to the drone/UAV was used to take video footage during the flight, which was related to the GPS location through the time stamp. The recorded video footage was manually transferred to a laptop for potential target detection using OpenCV and YOLOv3. The system design is reported in detail, and experiments were conducted to verify the effectiveness of the developed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207