MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385660073 · doi:10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-6184

Numerical Study on the Effect of Climate Parameters on the Extreme Thermal Gradients in Concrete Box Girders

2023· article· en· W4385660073 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saad Saad, Abdul Nasır, Rashid Bashir, S. J. Pantazopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bridge Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)ThermalRange (aeronautics)Structural engineeringGirderDeckFinite element methodEnvironmental scienceTemperature gradientMeteorologyEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bridge codes tend to provide general guidance on the thermal gradients acting on bridge decks based on data from historical extreme events that have occurred within a country, without considering the location of the bridge itself. However, the thermal gradient is a function of the climate conditions that occur locally, in the vicinity of the bridge. Thus, a significant number of bridge decks are designed for climate conditions that might not be representative of their locations. The aim of this research is to optimize current guidelines to ensure that thermal gradients are derived based on bridge location. This objective is achieved through the investigation of the relationship that occurs between climate parameters and the resulting thermal extremes. An advanced finite-element platform was used to model the thermal performance of a concrete box girder. Several sets of meteorological data from 18 locations across Canada (representative of different Canadian climate types) were used as input in the thermal models to simulate the temperature distribution within the bridge deck. Upon analysis of the results, it was determined that a correlation exists between the direct normal irradiance (DNI) at a certain location and the resulting thermal differential that occurs between the top and the interior of the cross section. Four categories were defined, with each category representing a range of DNI values and a resulting range of thermal differentials between the top and the interior. To demonstrate the applicability of the established relationship, a case study was performed in which the maximum limit provided by the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code was investigated across several provinces in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bridge EngineeringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207