MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Compressive Sensing-Based Channel Estimation for MIMO OTFS Systems

2023· article· en· W4385688967 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Mohebbi, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMatching pursuitCompressed sensingAlgorithmMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Block (permutation group theory)Computer scienceOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMIMO-OFDMModulation (music)Minimum mean square errorFrequency domainMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer visionStatisticsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation is a novel two-dimensional modulation technique that performs in the delay-Doppler (DD) domain. In this work, we present a new compressive sensing (CS)-based algorithm for estimating the channel in the DD domain for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) OTFS systems. Exploiting the property that the MIMO channel in the DD domain exhibits structured sparsity, we first obtain a row-block sparse formulation for channel estimation (CE) problem. Then, we propose a row-block orthogonal matching pursuit (RBOMP) algorithm to estimate the channel. Computer simulations demonstrate that the proposed algorithm enhances the estimation accuracy compared with the conventional minimum mean squared error (MMSE)-based and the existing CS-based CE techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207