Integrated job-shop scheduling in an FMS with heterogeneous transporters: MILP formulation, constraint programming, and branch-and-bound
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current studies on scheduling of machines and transporters assume that either a single transporter or an infinite number of homogeneous transporters such as AGVs or mobile robots are available to transport semi-finished jobs, which seems very restrictive in practice. This paper addresses this gap by studying a job-shop scheduling problem that incorporates a limited number of heterogeneous transporters, where the objective is to minimize the makespan. The problem is modelled using mixed-integer linear programming and constraint programming. Different structure-based branch-and-bound algorithms with two lower-bounding strategies are also developed. A comprehensive numerical study evaluates the proposed models and algorithms. The research demonstrates that the adjustment of the proposed MILP model outperforms the existing formulation when applied to the homogeneous case. The study also uncovers interesting practical implications, including the analysis of the impact of different transporter types in the system. It shows that utilizing a fleet of heterogeneous transporters can improve the overall performance of the job shop compared to a relevant homogeneous case. The importance of the study is emphasized by highlighting the negative consequences of disregarding transporters' differences during the scheduling phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it