MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385833092 · doi:10.1017/9781911116844.009

Introduction: Reconceptualizing Place: Doreen Massey oon Relational Geographical Processes

2018· other· en· W4385833092 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural History and Identity Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With nationalist, anti-immigrant, and white supremacist politics again on the rise, Massey’s writing from the 1990s and early 2000s is strikingly, almost painfully relevant today. Her distinctively geographic entrance point into these debates was through re-envisioning place. In Massey’s analysis, place is not a static, bounded, homogenous territory to be defended against incursion, but instead the interconnected product of relations stretching across multiple scales, interlinking us in relations of tension and solidarity. In the chapters in this section, Massey builds on this conceptualization of place as process (Chapter 9) to reframe the geographical roots of identity (Chapter 10), re-envision the bases of political solidarity (Chapter 8), examine the contested boundaries between home and work (Chapter 11), redirect the left’s critique of globalization (Chapter 12), and propose a powerful re-imagining of citizenship and the importance of ‘care at a distance’ (Chapter 13). Massey’s re-envisioning of place as a constellation of social, economic, and cultural relations stretched across space, some restrictive and some enabling, is common to all the chapters in this section, but is theorized most explicitly in Chapters 9 and 10: “Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place” and “A place called home?”. As she conceptualizes it, the uniqueness of a particular place comes not from a bounded, internally nurtured, singular identity, but from the specificity of its linkages to other places and scales as they accumulate and interact over time. Individual places are extraverted: linked to the wider world and knit together out of multiple identities (Chapter 10). The global, national, and local scales which can seem so distinct, she argues, are in fact shaped and co-constituted not only by flows and interconnections of capital and labour, but also of meaning, culture and ideas. Crucially, different individuals, groups, and places have very different relations to these interconnections. Some create them, some are stuck with them; some benefit from them in ways that weaken others’ ability to do so (Chapter 9). One of Massey’s key points in these chapters is that the uniqueness of place stems not from homogeneity, but from multiplicity and heterogeneity. Acknowledging differences along axes of race, class, gender, and colonial history is one of the most characteristic aspects of her work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3480.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural History and Identity FormationFrench-language works237,207