MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385847008 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.a904219

Serpent River Resurgence: Confronting Uranium Mining at Elliot Lake by Leanne Leddy (review)

2023· article· en· W4385847008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismUranium miningArchaeologyHistoryEthnologyGeographyUraniumEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Serpent River Resurgence: Confronting Uranium Mining at Elliot Lake by Leanne Leddy Warren Bernauer (bio) Serpent River Resurgence: Confronting Uranium Mining at Elliot Lake by Leanne Leddy University of Toronto Press, 2022 in the second half of the twentieth century, a series of uranium mines in the Elliot Lake area in Canada played important roles in facilitating the United States' nuclear weapons program and the (closely related) development of "civilian" nuclear power programs in North America. Leanne Leddy's Serpent River Resurgence provides a unique and critically important history of uranium mining in the Elliot Lake area from the perspective of the Serpent River First Nation (SRFN), an Anishinaabe nation in Northern Ontario upon whose territory the settler town of Elliot Lake is situated. Based on a combination of oral history and archival research, Serpent River Resurgence makes critically important contributions to the Indigenous studies literature about uranium mining, settler colonialism, and Indigenous resurgence. Leanne Leddy is a member of the SRFN who grew up in Elliot Lake and is currently an associate professor in Indigenous studies at Wilfred Laurier University. Leddy's meticulous empirical research, combined with insights and analysis reflecting her membership in SRFN, resulted in a rich case study of one Indigenous nation's experiences with colonial dispossession and Indigenous resistance. Serpent River Resurgence contains compelling arguments about the colonial implications of the Cold War nuclear arms race for the Serpent River Anishinaabe, as well as the power of Indigenous resistance and resurgence to challenge colonial relationships and processes. It includes chapters examining the history of SRFN before 1950, the establishment of the settler community of Elliot Lake and associated uranium mines, the construction and operation of a sulfuric acid plant on reserve land, and Anishinaabe resistance. Serpent River Resurgence clearly articulates the profound loss the Serpent River Anishinaabe experienced as a result of centuries of colonial incursions, especially those related to uranium mining. Leddy shows how the establishment of a uranium mining industry on SRFN territory led to an influx of settlers and left a legacy of radioactive tailings and acid waste. The operation of the acid plant on reserve land—which supplied sulfuric acid to the uranium industry—similarly left a legacy of contamination that [End Page 178] seriously disrupted the Anishinaabe land-based economy. The fact that the Serpent River Anishinaabe were excluded from important decisions about the uranium industry undermined their traditional role as stewards of the land. At the same time, Leddy shows that the Serpent River Anishinaabe were not simply passive victims of settler colonialism and the nuclear industry. As the title suggests, her book uses a conceptual framework of Indigenous resurgence and celebrates SFRN's long history of resistance to colonialism: "Whether it was to question rapid and extensive expansion of uranium production at Elliot Lake, to attend meetings in Toronto or Ottawa, or to threaten to block the highway if [the Department of Indian Affairs] continued to impede a clean-up process of the acid site, SRFN community members resorted to creative and consistent means of asserting Indigenous rights" (139). According to Leddy, these strategic interventions led to an important process of Indigenous resurgence, insofar as they resulted in the Serpent River Anishinaabe reestablishing their traditional role in land stewardship. Serpent River Resurgence will be of interest to scholars working in Indigenous studies and beyond, especially those whose teaching and research interests include Indigenous resurgence, settler colonialism, the nuclear industry, Anishinaabe history, and the politics of the Cold War. It will be a useful reading for senior undergraduate and graduate courses in Indigenous studies, political ecology, and environmental studies. The fact that Anishinaabe communities in northern Ontario are currently facing proposals for a repository for Canada's high-level nuclear waste makes Leddy's work timely and relevant to broader public debates about the future of the nuclear industry in the region. [End Page 179] Warren Bernauer WARREN BERNAUER is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Environment and Geography and the Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba. Copyright © 2023 Regents of the University of Minnesota

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207