Household energy and comfort impacts under teleworking scenarios via a zoned residential HVAC system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teleworking is a prevalent example of partial building occupancy and prevents homeowners from using a setback or set up temperature setpoint to save energy. Due to a lack of certainty on how teleworking affects houses, this study aimed to quantify energy consumption and thermal comfort under different teleworking scenarios. Likewise, the effect of HVAC zoning by comparing two-zone houses with one-zone houses is investigated. Three teleworking scenarios across six Canadian climate zones were used to assess two house models with two HVAC zoning configurations. The results of this study indicate that teleworking increases energy consumption by up to 9% in houses. By employing the two-zone house instead of the one-zone house, energy performance benefits from using two thermostats in a house. The results show that two-zone HVAC systems can reduce energy consumption by up to 31% and thermal discomfort by up to 24% compared to traditional one-zone houses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it