MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386046982 · doi:10.1039/d3cs00453h

A beginners guide to understanding the mechanisms of photochemical reactions: things you should know if light is one of your reagents

2023· review· en· W4386046982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsReagentPopularityPhotochemistryChemistryComputer scienceCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing popularity of applied photochemistry has changed the composition of the practitioners of photochemistry, from traditional specialists, to users whose expertise lies elsewhere, yet they find light as a useful and powerful reagent. I introduce Kasha's rule very early in this tutorial; this unconventional approach allows me to bypass information about high electronic states in favor of the lowest singlet and triplet excited states. Doing this I try to provide a fast entry enabling newcomers in the field of applied photochemistry to have a taste of what the field has to offer, in the hope that they will like what they see, and venture further into the many resources available to go deeper into the fascinating field of organic photochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it