MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386053890 · doi:10.37256/aie.4220233058

A Framework for Open World Object Detection

2023· article· en· W4386053890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Evolution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTamkeenYork UniversityNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsPascal (unit)Object detectionComputer scienceViola–Jones object detection frameworkArtificial intelligenceBenchmark (surveying)Object (grammar)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionObject-class detectionParametric statisticsMachine learningComputer visionMethodPattern recognition (psychology)Object-oriented programmingMathematicsFace detection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open World Object Detection (OWOD) is a computer vision task that focuses on real-world scenarios where object detection algorithms need to not only detect known and labeled objects but also handle novel and unknown objects that were not seen during training. This distinguishes OWOD from traditional object detection benchmarks, where the scope is limited to detecting only known object classes. The main challenge in OWOD lies in detecting and classifying unknown objects, which were not part of the training data. In standard object detection, objects not overlapping with labeled objects are automatically classified as background. However, these approaches are not suitable for OWOD, as unknown objects may be wrongly predicted as background due to the lack of specific supervision for distinguishing unknown objects from the background. The paper proposes a novel framework for Open World Object Detection called Open World Object Detection based on Non-Parametric classification (OWOD-NP). This method aims to address the challenges of identifying unknown objects and extending the knowledge base by incrementally introducing new object categories. OWOD-NP incorporates a non-parametric learning approach based on mean prototypes and rejection criteria into a standard detector model. The non-parametric learning model allows the system to detect whether the perceived region contains an unknown object and perform incremental learning in an end-to-end manner. The extensive experiments conducted on the benchmark dataset of Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) validate the effectiveness of OWOD-NP. Compared to the standard faster RCNN model, OWOD-NP achieves approximately 14% higher mean Average Precision (mAP) in class incremental scenarios. This improvement showcases the capability of OWOD-NP to handle open-world object detection tasks more efficiently. By combining non-parametric learning with object detection, OWOD-NP provides a promising solution for open-world scenarios, where the environment is dynamic and new objects may appear over time. The ability to detect and classify both known and unknown objects makes OWOD-NP a valuable approach for real-world applications in robotics, autonomous systems, and other computer vision tasks. It allows for continuous adaptation and learning, enabling the system to extend its knowledge and cope with ever-changing environments effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it