Gamelan Selonding as Part of an Essential Instrument in the Sustainment of the Sacred Art Activities of the Batur Indigenous People in Kintamani, Bali
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the gamelan selonding, which has become an important part of the structure of the sacred arts of the people in the Batur customary environment, Bali. In general, gamelan selonding is not an essential instrument in Balinese sacred art activities. In contrast to the sacred art activities of the Batur indigenous people, gamelan selonding seems to be something essential. Method: Both of the problems have been resolved by using qualitative methods. All primary data was successfully collected through observation, FGD, and interviews with informants in Kintamani, Bali. Some of the data classified as secondary was successfully collected through literature studies on Balinese culture. All data were analysed qualitatively using practise theory, symbol theory, and reception theory. Practical theory with the help of symbol theory and reception theory is used in analysing the contribution of gamelan selonding to the sacred art activities of the Batur customary villager, while symbol theory and reception theory with the help of practical theory are used in analysing the form of gamelan selonding. Results: Gamelan selonding is an essential part of the continuation of the sacred arts of the Batur indigenous people due to the existence of religious benefits, social benefits, artistic benefits, and cultural capital. As an essential instrument, the gamelan selonding is often used by the indigenous people of Batur for artistic activities in the sacred area of Kintamani, Bali. The gamelan selonding is a type of traditional Balinese musical instrument with a seven-tone pelog barrel. The shape of this gamelan physically consists of two pelvises and a wide blade made of iron, which is placed on a pelawah wooden. Conclusion: The gamelan selonding holds significant importance among the sacred arts of the indigenous Batur community, since it encompasses various dimensions including religious, social, aesthetic, and cultural aspects. This gamelan ensemble under consideration comprises two resonating chambers and a broad metallic blade positioned above a hardwood resonator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".