MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386217659 · doi:10.3905/jod.2023.1.189

The Performance of Jump Models to Price Commodity Options

2023· article· en· W4386217659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Derivatives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractHedgeCommodityJumpPortfolioEconomicsEconometricsValue (mathematics)Financial economicsMathematicsStatisticsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a new model to explain the commodity futures curve and price options on these futures. The model contains a jump in the futures returns, where the size of the jumps follows seasonal patterns. A quasi-analytical solution for the prices of call and put options is presented. The model is calibrated empirically using daily data and compared in and out of sample with popular benchmarks. The analysis shows that the proposed jump model outperforms standard benchmarks for seasonal commodities, and this out-performance is economically significant. More specifically, our analysis reveals that accounting for seasonality in the size of jumps for a seasonal commodity leads to a considerably better pricing of futures options and performs well to hedge and to predict the value-at-risk of a seasonal commodity option portfolio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it