MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386245981 · doi:10.32920/24050721

Fault Detection Under Uncertainty in Active Hybrid Distribution Networks

2023· preprint· en· W4386245981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectricity Theft Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityDistributed generationComputer scienceProbabilistic logicSmart gridGridActive networkingConvertersDistributed computingEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceRenewable energyMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Contemporary distribution networks incorporate Distributed Energy Resources (DER) and encompass both AC and DC systems interfaced with various types of power electronic converters. These active hybrid networks are the new norm in generating, distributing, and consuming electric energy in a sustainable manner, hence being integral to the holistic concept of the Smart Grid that aims for goals like self-awareness, high resiliency, self-healing, and bidirectionality of energy flow. Achieving these objectives, however, requires collecting and communicating real-time information to estimate the system state with high accuracy and low latency, and quickly discover potential faults or malfunctions. </p> <p>Even though partial observability has always been a prevalent challenge in distribution grids, active hybrid distribution networks are wreaked by further sources of uncertainty including inherent stochasticity of DER generation, inclusion of non-linear power electronic converters that interface DER with the grid, heterogeneity of AC and DC systems, and finally receiving noisy or potentially corrupt data. Therefore, improved fault detection schemes must be capable to handle uncertainty, as conventional zonal protection schemes are less reliable once applied to active hybrid distribution networks (AHDN). </p> <p>The proposed novel methodology in this research relies on retaining a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) paradigm for decision making under uncertainty which enhances the performance of existing relaying and protection schemes. AHDN is a multivariate dynamic system; thus, it can be efficiently analyzed by resorting to probabilistic graphical model formalism. A factor graph representation (FG) has been used to pass messages among cluster nodes. Furthermore, to collect causal data, a distributed state estimation (DSE) has been employed, where deviation of state variables within their probability distribution function (PDF) signals a likely fault. To feed the graph with correlational evidence, the data collected from IoT sensors are exploited. Since phasor measurement units (PMU) and DSE algorithm are used to compute state variables, the proposed methodology spans over the inherent heterogeneity of AC and DC agents. Additionally, because both the magnitude of anomalies or abrupt changes and their trajectory are used to detect faults, thus shifts towards PDF mean are eliminated to reduce false positive rate (FPR). </p> <p>The proposed methodology is intended to accompany and enhance conventional protection schemes as outlined in IEEE standards 1547 and 2030 for DER interconnection. The method is mainly a decision-making process for detecting and locating faults, and it can be successfully applied to both passive and active networks. It functions well without a priori knowledge about the bonding and grounding scheme and whether the neutral is earthed or not; the latter has been a source of difficulty in islanded microgrids. Furthermore, the proposed technique can identify low and high impedance faults within the range of 0.1 pu to 10 pu, and it discerns open circuit faults whenever possible. Due to its scalability, the proposed method can be applied to larger systems with various measurement sources. </p> <p>The purported fault detection scheme has been simulated in MATLAB / SIMULINK environment. After verifying the concept, the model has been applied to an experimental test bench which has been developed and validated by the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) to compare and establish the results. Then it is implemented in an augmented version of IEEE 13- bus to corroborate its functionality and illustrate the outcome. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207