MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386248550 · doi:10.1017/9781009303897.002

Idiomatic Python

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386248550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceProgramming languageSlicingCompilerLinguisticsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After a discussion of best programming practices and a brief summary of basic features of the Python programming language, chapter 1 discusses several modern idioms. These include the use of list comprehensions, dictionaries, the for-else idiom, as well as other ways to iterate Pythonically. Throughout, the focus is on programming in a way which feels natural, i.e., working with the language (as opposed to working against the language). The chapter also includes basic information on how to make figures using Matplotlib, as well as advice on how to effectively use the NumPy library, with an emphasis on slicing, vectorization, and broadcasting. The chapter is rounded out by a physics project, which studies the visualization of electric fields, and a problem set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it