MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386250690 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp16750

Natural Language Processing of Radiology Reports: Predicting Metastatic Progression from Text Data

2023· article· en· W4386250690 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lola Assad

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReadabilityContext (archaeology)Natural language processingArtificial intelligenceSentenceInformation retrievalUnified Medical Language SystemSNOMED CTRadiologyMedical physicsMedicineTerminologyLinguisticsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project’s goal is to extract tumour measurement data from oncological radiology reports with equal, or improved accuracy of a human radiologist. The purpose is to streamline and improve the efficiency of cancer diagnosis, accomplishing this through methods in artificial intelligence. In this experiment, a collection of 85,218 colorectal, and lung radiology reports were used. After loading reports into a data frame, and a BioBERT (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers pre-trained on biomedical corpora) model into a virtual environment, a question is set to be answered by the model where the context of the question is each radiology report’s findings section of the specified organ. These inputs are tokenized and embedded into numerical values to map sentences to vectors of real numbers. Vectors are fed into the model, and an answer is output in natural language for human readability. Answers are stored in the data frame in their corresponding row from which they were derived. The model successfully answered questions about measurements of tumours written in free text in reports where tumours were present, and successfully ignored or did not report in cases where tumours were not present, or measurements were unchanged. In cases with multiple tumours, the model reported exclusively first listed measurements. In an updated version of this model, context will be run through sentence-wise to ensure equal attention to the context entirely. This project is evidence that using one question and selecting the findings portion of a radiology report for one organ as context in a question-answering model built using BioBERT is effective, and efficient in collecting measurements from radiology reports. This algorithm can be applied to other areas of medicine, or other fields entirely with a few model alterations. This project is a step forward in improving cancer diagnosis efficiency and improving medical AI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207