MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386326396 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2022.0175

Fast Continuous and Integer L-Shaped Heuristics Through Supervised Learning

2023· article· en· W4386326396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsComputer scienceOperations researchInteger (computer science)Knapsack problemInteger programmingMathematical optimizationContainer (type theory)MathematicsAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a methodology at the nexus of operations research and machine learning (ML) leveraging generic approximators available from ML to accelerate the solution of mixed-integer linear two-stage stochastic programs. We aim at solving problems where the second stage is demanding. Our core idea is to gain large reductions in online solution time, while incurring small reductions in first-stage solution accuracy by substituting the exact second-stage solutions with fast, yet accurate, supervised ML predictions. This upfront investment in ML would be justified when similar problems are solved repeatedly over time—for example, in transport planning related to fleet management, routing, and container yard management. Our numerical results focus on the problem class seminally addressed with the integer and continuous L-shaped cuts. Our extensive empirical analysis is grounded in standardized families of problems derived from stochastic server location (SSLP) and stochastic multi-knapsack (SMKP) problems available in the literature. The proposed method can solve the hardest instances of SSLP in less than 9% of the time it takes the state-of-the-art exact method, and in the case of SMKP, the same figure is 20%. Average optimality gaps are, in most cases, less than 0.1%. History: Accepted by Alice Smith, Area Editor (for this paper) for Design and Analysis of Algorithms–Discrete. Funding: Financial support from the Institut de Valorisation des Données (IVADO) Fundamental Research Project Grants [project entitled “Machine Learning for (Discrete) Optimization”]; Canada Research Chairs; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Collaborative Research and Development Grant CRD-477938-14]; and the Canadian National Railway Company Chair in Optimization of Railway Operations at Université de Montréal is gratefully acknowledged. E. Frejinger holds a Canada Research Chair. Computations were made on the supercomputer Béluga, managed by Calcul Québec and Digital Research Alliance of Canada. The operation of this supercomputer is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation; the Ministère de l’Économie, de la Science et de l’Innovation du Québec; and the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Nature et Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it