A Robust Keyframe-Based Visual SLAM for RGB-D Cameras in Challenging Scenarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accuracy of RGB-D SLAM systems is sensitive to the image quality, and can be significantly compromised in adverse situations such as when input images are blurry, lacking in texture features, or overexposed. In this paper, based on Continuous Direct Sparse Visual Odometry (CVO), we present a novel Keyframe-based CVO (KF-CVO) with intrinsic keyframe selection mechanism that effectively reduces the tracking error. We then extend KF-CVO to a RGB-D SLAM system, CVO SLAM, equipped with place recognition via ORB features, and joint bundle adjustment & pose graph optimization. Comprehensive evaluations on publicly available benchmarks show that the proposed RGB-D SLAM system achieves a higher success rate than current state-of-the-art-methods. The proposed system is more robust to difficult benchmark sequences than current state-of-the-art methods, where adverse situations such as rapid camera motions, environments lacking in texture, and overexposed images due to strong illumination exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".