MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386462540 · doi:10.18280/rces.100202

Automatic Segmentation of Cervical Precancerous Lesions in Colposcopy Image Using Pyramid Scene Parsing Network and Transfer Learning

2023· article· en· W4386462540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Computer Engineering Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHebei University
KeywordsColposcopyArtificial intelligencePyramid (geometry)ParsingComputer scienceSegmentationTransfer of learningComputer visionMedicineCervical cancerInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide.According to the 2020 estimates by GLOBOCAN in 185 countries, there were 604,000 new cases of cervical cancer and 342,000 deaths.In clinical practice, the segmentation of LSIL+ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia+cervical cancer) lesions in colposcopic images (cervical imaging) is essential for assisting gynecologists in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grading and cervical cancer.It can also aid gynecologists in identifying the precise lesion area for further pathological examination.Existing computer-aided diagnosis algorithms exhibit poor segmentation performance due to insufficient training data that fail to focus on semantically meaningful lesion parts.In this study, we employed the improved Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet-ResNet50) computer-aided diagnosis algorithm to automatically segment LSIL+ lesion areas in colposcopic images.We collected 971 images containing low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia LSIL (CIN 1), high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia HSIL (CIN 2/CIN 3), and cervical cancer from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Hebei University Affiliated Hospital.Two experienced gynecologists annotated the LSIL+ lesion areas to create a dataset for cervical lesion segmentation.We designed a lesion-aware convolution neural network transfer learning strategy to accomplish the lesion segmentation task.Comprehensive experiments were conducted to evaluate the proposed method's segmentation performance on clinical cervical images.Our research findings indicate that the PSPNet-ResNet50 network used in this study achieved the best segmentation results for automated (LSIL+ area) segmentation, with pixel accuracy (PA), mean pixel accuracy (MPA), precision (Pre), recall (Re), F1 score (F1), and mean intersection over union (MIoU) values of 95.21%, 89.83%, 84.58%, 82.22%, 83.38%, and 83.83%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it