MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386483003 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-chwlj

Plasmonic group IV transition metal carbide interfaces for solar-driven desalination

2023· preprint· en· W4386483003 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew J. Margeson, Mark Atwood, Mita Dasog

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOcean Frontier InstituteCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsDesalinationMaterials scienceCarbideNanomaterialsEvaporationRelative humidityWater vaporChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMembraneChemistryMetallurgyMeteorologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To combat the dwindling supply of freshwater, solar-driven desalination using plasmonic nanomaterials has emerged as a promising and renewable solution. Effective materials must exhibit high solar-to-vapor conversion efficiencies, be inexpensive, chemically stable, and maintain performance over time. Refractory plasmonic carbide nanomaterials are exciting candidates that could meet these demands but have not been as widely explored. Here, we investigate plasmonic carbide interfaces made of TiC, ZrC, and HfC nanoparticles loaded onto to a mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane gain insight into their solar-vapor generation and desalination potential. Evaporation rates and efficiencies were determined for tap water and saltwater with varying salt concentrations. Desalination using Atlantic Ocean water under 1 sun intensity yielded rates of 1.26 ± 0.01, 1.18 ± 0.02, and 1.40 ± 0.01 kg m-2 h-1, with efficiencies of 86, 80, and 96% for TiC, ZrC, and HfC, respectively, under 1 sun illumination. Carbide interfaces effectively removed salt and metal ions from the water and were able to reject salt over extended periods of desalination and high salt concentrations of up to 35%. The effect of ambient temperature and relative humidity on the desalination process was also investigated which showed that the evaporation rates and efficiencies decrease with increasing humidity and decreasing room temperature. However, the performance of HfC was less affected by the changes in the ambient conditions compared to TiC and ZrC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicSolar-Powered Water Purification MethodsFrench-language works237,207