Discovering Interesting Patterns from Hypergraphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hypergraph is a complex data structure capable of expressing associations among any number of data entities. Overcoming the limitations of traditional graphs, hypergraphs are useful to model real-life problems. Frequent pattern mining is one of the most popular problems in data mining with a lot of applications. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no flexible pattern mining framework for hypergraph databases decomposing associations among data entities. In this article, we propose a flexible and complete framework for mining frequent patterns from a collection of hypergraphs. To discover more interesting patterns beyond the traditional frequent patterns, we propose frameworks for weighted and uncertain hypergraph mining also. We develop three algorithms for mining frequent, weighted, and uncertain hypergraph patterns efficiently by introducing a canonical labeling technique for isomorphic hypergraphs. Extensive experiments have been conducted on real-life hypergraph databases to show both the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed frameworks and algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it