MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386501692 · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2960

The Global, Regional, and National Burden of Adult Lip, Oral, and Pharyngeal Cancer in 204 Countries and Territories

2023· review· en· W4386501692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical SciencesLeibniz-GemeinschaftNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Florida HealthSamsungKing Saud UniversityUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergMonash University MalaysiaFakultet Medicinskih Nauka, Univerziteta U KragujevcuInstitute for Advanced Studies in Basic SciencesUniversity of ColomboXiamen UniversityNational Institute for Medical Research DevelopmentYasuj University of Medical SciencesUniversity of WashingtonWuhan UniversitySigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöGuilan University of Medical SciencesMasarykova UniverzitaShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesHacettepe ÜniversitesiBirjand University of Medical SciencesZhejiang UniversityKerman University of Medical SciencesRajarata University of Sri LankaAin Shams UniversityShiraz University of Medical SciencesCollege of Medicine, Korea UniversityWorld Health OrganizationMazandaran University of Medical SciencesKing Abdulaziz UniversityIsfahan University of Medical SciencesPasteur Institute of IranUniversitatea din BucureștiAlexandria UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PadovaKorea UniversityOulun YliopistoPohang University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of GondarMassachusetts General HospitalLékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzitaRadboud UniversiteitImperial College LondonShiraz UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMonash UniversityKarolinska InstitutetNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversity of QueenslandAmity UniversityMashhad University of Medical SciencesPublic Health EnglandRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandUniversity of LeedsPublic Health Foundation of IndiaSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalIndian Council of Medical ResearchNational University of SingaporeUniversity of WarwickCoventry UniversityEuropean CommissionNational Human Genome Research InstituteMacquarie UniversityJSS Academy of Higher Education and ResearchDire Dawa UniversityPolitechnika GdańskaUniversity of ExeterModernaKasturba Medical College, ManipalKermanshah University of Medical SciencesVanderbilt UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsRafsanjan University of Medical SciencesLouisiana State UniversitySeres TherapeuticsWellcome TrustJohns Hopkins UniversityAmarin CorporationIran University of Medical SciencesBill and Melinda Gates FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversità degli Studi di MilanoSaveetha Dental CollegeNational Defense Medical CollegeIntuitive SurgicalSveučilište u ZagrebuSocial Science Research CouncilNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of South CarolinaBournemouth UniversityThe Wellcome Trust DBT India AllianceFlinders UniversityUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulHarvard UniversityUniversità di CataniaGolestan University of Medical SciencesTehran University of Medical Sciences and Health ServicesAnglia Ruskin UniversityTehran Heart CenterNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Veterinary and Animal SciencesFlorida Department of HealthKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaJordan University of Science and TechnologyMcMaster UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of Alabama at BirminghamPlastic Surgery Foundation
KeywordsMedicineCancerMEDLINEFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Lip, oral, and pharyngeal cancers are important contributors to cancer burden worldwide, and a comprehensive evaluation of their burden globally, regionally, and nationally is crucial for effective policy planning. Objective: To analyze the total and risk-attributable burden of lip and oral cavity cancer (LOC) and other pharyngeal cancer (OPC) for 204 countries and territories and by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) using 2019 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) Study estimates. Evidence Review: The incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to LOC and OPC from 1990 to 2019 were estimated using GBD 2019 methods. The GBD 2019 comparative risk assessment framework was used to estimate the proportion of deaths and DALYs for LOC and OPC attributable to smoking, tobacco, and alcohol consumption in 2019. Findings: In 2019, 370 000 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 338 000-401 000) cases and 199 000 (95% UI, 181 000-217 000) deaths for LOC and 167 000 (95% UI, 153 000-180 000) cases and 114 000 (95% UI, 103 000-126 000) deaths for OPC were estimated to occur globally, contributing 5.5 million (95% UI, 5.0-6.0 million) and 3.2 million (95% UI, 2.9-3.6 million) DALYs, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, low-middle and low SDI regions consistently showed the highest age-standardized mortality rates due to LOC and OPC, while the high SDI strata exhibited age-standardized incidence rates decreasing for LOC and increasing for OPC. Globally in 2019, smoking had the greatest contribution to risk-attributable OPC deaths for both sexes (55.8% [95% UI, 49.2%-62.0%] of all OPC deaths in male individuals and 17.4% [95% UI, 13.8%-21.2%] of all OPC deaths in female individuals). Smoking and alcohol both contributed to substantial LOC deaths globally among male individuals (42.3% [95% UI, 35.2%-48.6%] and 40.2% [95% UI, 33.3%-46.8%] of all risk-attributable cancer deaths, respectively), while chewing tobacco contributed to the greatest attributable LOC deaths among female individuals (27.6% [95% UI, 21.5%-33.8%]), driven by high risk-attributable burden in South and Southeast Asia. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic analysis, disparities in LOC and OPC burden existed across the SDI spectrum, and a considerable percentage of burden was attributable to tobacco and alcohol use. These estimates can contribute to an understanding of the distribution and disparities in LOC and OPC burden globally and support cancer control planning efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it