A sequential cross-product knowledge accumulation, extraction and transfer framework for machine learning-based production process modelling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine learning is a promising method to model production processes and predict product quality. It is challenging to accurately model complex systems due to data scarcity, as mass customisation leads to various high-variety low-volume products. This study conceptualised knowledge accumulation, extraction, and transfer (KAET) to exploit the knowledge embedded in similar entities to address data scarcity. A sequential cross-product KAET (SeqTrans) is proposed to conduct KAET, integrating data preparation and preprocessing, feature selection (FS), feature learning (FL), and transfer learning (TL). The FS and FL modules conduct knowledge extraction and help address various practical challenges such as changing operating conditions and unbalanced datasets. In this paper, sequential TL is introduced to production modelling to conduct knowledge transfer among multiple entities. The first case study of auxetic material performance prediction demonstrates the effectiveness of sequential TL. Compared with conventional TL, sequential TL can achieve the same test mean square errors with 300 fewer training examples when facing data scarcity. In the second case study, balancing anomaly detection models were constructed for two gas turbines in the same series using real-world production data. With SeqTrans, the F1-score of the anomaly detection model of the data-poor engine was improved from 0.769 to 0.909.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it