MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386546986 · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1282798

Editorial: New frontiers in parallel robotics

2023· editorial· en· W4386546986 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Briot, Jessica Burgner-Kahrs

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Robotics and AI · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoboticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFuture of roboticsRobotSoft roboticsData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are also fully convinced that these emerging topics can only be investigated adequately with bringing together researchers from those distinct communities but with a common interest in parallel robotics to share their experiences, methods, challenges, and issues. Addressing the challenges associated with these new topics from several different complementary perspectives and solutions related to the design, modeling, and control of these novel complex solutions will be beneficial for accelerating the research on these new frontiers of parallel robotics. This research topic, "New Frontiers in Parallel Robotics," includes papers on cable-driven parallel robots (CDPRs), continuum parallel robots and underactuated grasping. Improving the performance of CDPRs is an essential topic in the community. Many current works are related to increasing their wrench closure workspace, studying the stability, proposing new control algorithms for the cabletension allocation or improving their accuracy. In this special issue, we have two papers related to this topic. The first one, entitled "Cable failure tolerant control and planning in a planar reconfigurable cable-driven parallel robot" (authors: A. Raman, I. Walker, V. Krovi and M. Schmid), is willing to propose an algorithm for control and planning which provides the ability to the robot to detect a cable break, thus improving the safety of its use by an operator in a collaborative context. The second paper, "Reconfiguration strategy for fully actuated translational cable-suspended parallel robots" (authors: J. Bettega, G. Boschetti, G. Piva, D. Richiedei, and A. Trevisani), deals with the problem of conserving the tension into the cables while achieving a task in a large workspace of several meter length.Continuum parallel robotics is an emerging field at the frontiers of continuum robots and parallel robotics. Many research questions are still open, among which are investigating new design concepts and finding efficient modelling, in particular for analyzing their dynamics, defining proper algorithms for their workspace computation or defining adequate indices for analyzing their performance. The paper "Singularity analysis of 3-DOF planar parallel continuum robots with constant curvature links" (authors: S. Lilge, K. Wen and J. Burgner-Kahrs) belongs to the latter case. This work conducts a singularity analysis for all possible continuum parallel robot architecture with three identical legs, providing a geometrical understanding of singularity occurrences.Underactuated robotics grippers are of great interest for many applications, especially for grasping fragile objects or avoiding the high cost of creating a robotized hand. The last (but not least) paper of this research topic, entitled "A compact underactuated gripper with two fingers and a retractable suction cup" (authors: J. Courchesne, P. Cardou and P. A. R. Onadja), presents the mechanical design of a new versatile and compact gripper able to grasp objects in constrained environments.In conclusion, the research on parallel robotics has moved beyond the traditional rigid-link fixed-base robots, and the focus has shifted toward exploring emerging types of parallel manipulators. This shift has led to significant scientific challenges, including designing, modeling, and controlling novel closed-chain mechanisms. The research topic "New Frontiers in Parallel Robotics" highlights some of the recent research in cable-driven parallel robots, continuum parallel robots, and underactuated grasping. The papers in this issue propose new control algorithms, reconfiguration strategies, and singularity analysis, among others. These findings will accelerate research on the new frontiers of parallel robotics and enable the development of novel applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0130.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Robotics and AISame topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207