Spatial analysis of polarimetric images to enhance near-surface sampling sensitivity: feasibility in demineralized teeth and other tissue-like media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: Early tooth demineralization may be detectable through spatial analysis of polarized light images as demonstrated in this study. This may also prove useful in the early detection of epithelial tumors that comprise the majority of the cancer burden worldwide. Aim: The spatial properties of polarized light images have not been greatly exploited in biomedicine to improve sensitivity to superficial tissue regions; therefore, we investigate the optical sampling depth effects as a function of location in the backscattered polarimetric images. Approach: Backscattered linear polarization intensity distributions exhibit four-lobed patterns arising through single-scattering, multiple-scattering, and geometrical effects. These photon pathway dynamics are investigated through experimental imaging of microsphere suspensions along with corroborative computational polarization-sensitive Monte Carlo modeling. The studied sampling depth effects of linear and circular polarization images (explored in a previous study) are then evaluated on normal and demineralized human teeth, which are known to differ in their surface and sub-surface structures. Results: Backscattered linear polarization images exhibit enhanced sensitivity to near-surface properties of media (for example, surface roughness and turbidity) at specific locations within the four-lobed patterns. This yields improved differentiation of two tooth types when spatially selecting image regions in the direction perpendicular to the incident linear polarization vector. Circular polarimetric imaging also yields improved differentiation through spatial selection of regions close to the site of illumination. Improved sensitivity to superficial tissues is achieved through a combination of these linear and circular polarimetric imaging approaches. Conclusions: Heightened sampling sensitivity to tissue microstructure in the surface/near-surface region of turbid tissue-like media and dental tissue is achieved through a judicious spatial selection of specific regions in the resultant co-linear and cross-circular backscattered polarimetric images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".