MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386568575 · doi:10.1145/3609102

Predictable GPU Wavefront Splitting for Safety-Critical Systems

2023· article· en· W4386568575 on OpenAlexaff
Artem Klashtorny, Zhuanhao Wu, Anirudh Mohan Kaushik, Hiren Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWavefrontCompilerCUDAAvionicsGraphics processing unitGeneral-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsParallel computingGraphicsEmbedded systemComputer graphics (images)OpticsOperating systemAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a predictable wavefront splitting (PWS) technique for graphics processing units (GPUs). PWS improves the performance of GPU applications by reducing the impact of branch divergence while ensuring that worst-case execution time (WCET) estimates can be computed. This makes PWS an appropriate technique to use in safety-critical applications, such as autonomous driving systems, avionics, and space, that require strict temporal guarantees. In developing PWS on an AMD-based GPU, we propose microarchitectural enhancements to the GPU, and a compiler pass that eliminates branch serializations to reduce the WCET of a wavefront. Our analysis of PWS exhibits a performance improvement of 11% over existing architectures with a lower WCET than prior works in wavefront splitting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing SystemsSame topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207