MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386568643 · doi:10.1145/3609109

Let Coarse-Grained Resources Be Shared: Mapping Entire Neural Networks on FPGAs

2023· article· en· W4386568643 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceCompilerHigh-level synthesisArtificial neural networkComputer architectureCoding (social sciences)Shared resourceEmbedded systemGate arrayParallel computingComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional High-Level Synthesis (HLS) provides rapid prototyping of hardware accelerators without coding with Hardware Description Languages (HDLs). However, such an approach does not well support allocating large applications like entire deep neural networks on a single Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) device. The approach leads to designs that are inefficient or do not fit into FPGAs due to resource constraints. This work proposes to shrink generated designs by coarse-grained resource control based on function sharing in functional Intermediate Representations (IRs). The proposed compiler passes and rewrite system aim at producing valid design points and removing redundant hardware. Such optimizations make fitting entire neural networks on FPGAs feasible and produce competitive performance compared to running specialized kernels for each layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it