Collaborative scheduling of machining-assembly in complex multiple parallel production lines environment considering kitting constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In multi-stage machining-assembly production, collaborative scheduling for multiple production lines can effectively improve the execution efficiency of production planning and increase the effective output of the production system. In this paper, a production scheduling mathematical model was constructed for the collaborative scheduling problem of machining-assembly multi-production lines with kitting constraints, with the optimization objectives of minimizing assembly completion time and tardiness time. For the scheduling model, the product assembly process is constrained by the machining sequence of the jobs on the machining lines. Only by collaborating on the production scheduling schemes of the machine line and the assembly line as a whole can the output efficiency of the product on the assembly line be improved. An improved hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm named SMOEA/D is designed to solve this scheduling model. The algorithm uses adaptive parents’ selection and mutation rate strategies and integrates the Tabu search strategy for the search process in the solution space when the solution of the sub-problem has not been improved after specified search generations, to improve the local search ability and search accuracy of MOEA/D algorithm. To verify the performance of the SMOEA/D algorithm in solving machining-assembly collaborative scheduling problems in production systems with different resource configurations and scales, two sets of numerical experiments were designed, corresponding to situations where the number of operations on each production line is equal or unequal. The running results of the proposed algorithm were compared with three other well-known multi-objective algorithms. The comparison results indicate that the SMOEA/D algorithm is effective and superior for solving such problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".