Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Actors are a popular mechanism for indirectly expressing concurrency. This article examines an implementation in the concurrent dialect of C ++, C ++, which runs actors on shared‐memory multi‐processor computers. The C ++ actor system targets 32–256+ multi‐core shared‐memory computers that form the backbone of high‐performance computing, rather than distributed actor communication or robust execution via parentage fallback used by other actor systems. Five new mechanisms are presented to achieve expressibility, robustness, high performance, and scalability of actor applications across multiple cores: explicit life time (storage management) of actors and messages, combining actors and coroutines, a forward message‐trace and backward message‐return for debugging and failures, a new promise call‐back for ask sends, and an actor implementation that inverts the actor execution‐model by decoupling actor mailboxes with high levels of sharding. Microbenchmarks compare the new actor features with CAF, Protoactor, and classic and typed Akka.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it