MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386807633 · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2023.100558

Performance analysis of the Thermo Osmotic Energy Conversion (TOEC) process for harvesting low-grade heat

2023· article· en· W4386807633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOsmotic powerMaterials scienceHeat transferProcess engineeringMembraneHeat sinkPressure-retarded osmosisMass transferPower stationEnvironmental scienceNuclear engineeringMechanicsThermodynamicsChemical engineeringMechanical engineeringChemistryEngineeringReverse osmosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-grade heat energy from resources below 100 °C is readily available in massive quantities worldwide. However, existing technologies face challenges in converting this heat power into usable forms of energy, such as electricity. This is primarily due to temperature fluctuations in these heat sources and the limited temperature gradient with the surrounding environment. To address this issue, a recently developed technology called thermo-osmotic energy conversion (TOEC) offers a promising solution for harvesting electrical energy from low-grade heat sources. In the TOEC method, a hydrophobic membrane facilitates the transfer of water vapor molecules from a moderately hot aqueous solution to a cold water stream. The resulting hydraulic pressure in the compressed water on the cold side can be harnessed using a hydro-turbine. Despite the many interesting features of TOEC technology, a comprehensive analysis of its performance under various operating conditions and membrane properties is currently lacking in the literature. In this study, we conducted a theoretical evaluation of the TOEC process based on mass and heat transfer phenomena, and we validated our findings with experimental data. Our results indicate that employing membranes with smaller pore size, low thickness, and high porosity, along with higher feed temperature and flowrates, can significantly enhance energy efficiency and power density. Specifically, we demonstrate that the utilization of hydrophobic membranes with nanometer-sized pores, coupled with hydraulic pressures ranging from 6.2 bar to 11.8 bar, enables us to achieve power densities exceeding 5 W/m2, given a 20 °C heat sink and a heat source temperature above 65 °C. Furthermore, we have determined that an applied hydraulic pressure of 9.4 bar yields the maximum energy efficiency value of 0.016%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it