Advancing Direct Convolution Using Convolution Slicing Optimization and ISA Extensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolution is one of the most computationally intensive operations that must be performed for machine learning model inference. A traditional approach to computing convolutions is known as the Im2Col + BLAS method. This article proposes SConv: a direct-convolution algorithm based on an MLIR/LLVM code-generation toolchain that can be integrated into machine-learning compilers. This algorithm introduces: (a) Convolution Slicing Analysis (CSA)—a convolution-specific 3D cache-blocking analysis pass that focuses on tile reuse over the cache hierarchy; (b) Convolution Slicing Optimization—a code-generation pass that uses CSA to generate a tiled direct-convolution macro-kernel; and (c) Vector-based Packing—an architecture-specific optimized input-tensor packing solution based on vector-register shift instructions for convolutions with unitary stride. Experiments conducted on 393 convolutions from full ONNX-MLIR machine learning models indicate that the elimination of the Im2Col transformation and the use of fast packing routines result in a total packing time reduction, on full model inference, of 2.3×–4.0× on Intel x86 and 3.3×–5.9× on IBM POWER10. The speed-up over an Im2Col + BLAS method based on current BLAS implementations for end-to-end machine-learning model inference is in the range of 11%–27% for Intel x86 and 11%–34% for IBM POWER10 architectures. The total convolution speedup for model inference is 13%–28% on Intel x86 and 23%–39% on IBM POWER10. SConv also outperforms BLAS GEMM, when computing pointwise convolutions in more than 82% of the 219 tested instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".