MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386990276 · doi:10.23977/acss.2023.070802

A Review of Collaborative Adaptive Cruise Control for Vehicle Queuing Technology

2023· review· en· W4386990276 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
An Zhao, Hongyun Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCooperative Adaptive Cruise ControlCruise controlTraffic congestionFuel efficiencyVehicle-to-vehicleTransport engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Automotive engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the modern economy, the number of cars on the road continues to increase, leading to escalating problems with traffic congestion. This paper outlines the progression of autonomous driving technology, emphasizing that a single autonomous vehicle is incapable of effectively mitigating traffic congestion. To further enhance the intelligence of traffic systems, this paper explores the potential value and application of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) within vehicle platooning technology, with an aim to alleviate road congestion and increase traffic efficiency. In terms of the scenarios and potential value involved, this paper highlights the positive impact of vehicle platooning technology on reducing aerodynamic drag, fuel consumption, carbon emissions, and enhancing road throughput. This technology can also improve road safety by reducing collision risks through real-time communication and coordination between vehicles. Moreover, by implementing vehicle platooning, road capacity can be increased, thereby alleviating traffic congestion. The paper also points out some technical difficulties and challenges associated with vehicle platooning technology, including communication reliability, sensor accuracy, automatic control algorithms, and safety assurance. A series of solutions are proposed to address the challenges faced by vehicle platooning technology. Furthermore, potential future trends in vehicle platooning technology are explored, such as experimental verification of larger scale vehicle platoons, and consideration of model uncertainty and interference robustness. In summary, this paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the potential and challenges of vehicle platooning technology in alleviating traffic congestion and enhancing traffic efficiency. By detailing the technical background, application scenarios, potential value, and solutions, this paper offers valuable guidance and research direction for the development of future intelligent traffic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Computer Signals and SystemsSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207