EEG‐based spatiotemporal dynamics of fast ripple networks and hubs in infantile epileptic spasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Infantile epileptic spasms (IS) are epileptic seizures that are associated with increased risk for developmental impairments, adult epilepsies, and mortality. Here, we investigated coherence-based network dynamics in scalp EEG of infants with IS to identify frequency-dependent networks associated with spasms. We hypothesized that there is a network of increased fast ripple connectivity during the electrographic onset of clinical spasms, which is distinct from controls. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed peri-ictal and interictal EEG recordings of 14 IS patients. The data was compared with 9 age-matched controls. Wavelet phase coherence (WPC) was computed between 0.2 and 400 Hz. Frequency- and time-dependent brain networks were constructed using this coherence as the strength of connection between two EEG channels, based on graph theory principles. Connectivity was evaluated through global efficiency (GE) and channel-based closeness centrality (CC), over frequency and time. RESULTS: GE in the fast ripple band (251-400 Hz) was significantly greater following the onset of spasms in all patients (P < 0.05). Fast ripple networks during the first 10s from spasm onset show enhanced anteroposterior gradient in connectivity (posterior > central > anterior, Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.001), with maximum CC over the centroparietal channels in 10/14 patients. Additionally, this anteroposterior gradient in CC connectivity is observed during spasms but not during the interictal awake or asleep states of infants with IS. In controls, anteroposterior gradient in fast ripple CC was noted during arousals and wakefulness but not during sleep. There was also a simultaneous decrease in GE in the 5-8 Hz range after the onset of spasms (P < 0.05), of unclear biological significance. SIGNIFICANCE: We identified an anteroposterior gradient in the CC connectivity of fast ripple hubs during spasms. This anteroposterior gradient observed during spasms is similar to the anteroposterior gradient in the CC connectivity observed in wakefulness or arousals in controls, suggesting that this state change is related to arousal networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".