MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387043540 · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2023_113

ELLIPTIC CURVE CRYPTOGRAPHY: IMPLEMENTATION USING GOOGLE APPS SCRIPT (GAS)

2023· article· en· W4387043540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Information Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElliptic curve cryptographyCryptographyComputer scienceElliptic Curve Digital Signature AlgorithmElliptic curveWorld Wide WebComputer securityPublic-key cryptographyMathematicsEncryptionPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) algorithms are two wellknown public-key encryption methods for transmitting data securely over an untrusted network.ECC is increasingly being adopted as an alternative to RSA to provide adequate security to systems and networks with less computational resources such as limited bandwidth, storage, and power.Because of the complexity of mathematics involve, it is a challenge to students and practitioners alike without adequate mathematical foundations to apply the ECC algorithm to compute appropriate public keys and encrypt and decrypt messages.In this paper the authors attempt to show how the ECC algorithm can be modeled with Google Sheets, and how Google App Scripts (GAS) can easily and effectively be used to encrypt and decrypt messages.The authors find that the ECC algorithm can be easily demonstrated to learners utilizing Google Sheets as the foundation.The authors also discuss the limitations and practical issues encountered when using Google Sheets and GAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it